This article is reprinted from the Summer 1999 issue of the EDA digest
Magnetic Shield Effectiveness
ABSTRACT/SUMMARY
Traditionally, magnetic fields have been conceptualized as lines of flux ( f) emanating from magnetic poles. Since then, magnetic systems of units have been developed, each with a particular purpose. Let us review two of these systems and see how they interrelate.Magnetic parameters include field intensity (H) , flux ( f) and flux density (b). The flux density and field intensity are related by b=mH,where m is the permeability of the material.In the CGS system of units, b is expressed in Gauss, Maxwells/cm2 or lines /cm2 while H is expressed in Oersteds. The permeability of free space, m0, equals one. Thus in free space, b=H, and their units are occasionally interchanged. This CGS system is very popular in transformer and shield design.In the rationalized MKS system of units, the permeability of free space, m0, is equal to 4px10-7. The flux, f, is expressed in Webers. The flux density, b, is expressed in Webers/meter2 or Tesla and the field intensity is expressed in Amperes/meter. The RMKS system is used in radio frequency field measurements, and it is popular because it makes conversion between electrical and mechanical units very easy. Table 1 may be utilized to convert between RMKS and CGS units.Magnetic shielding can be achieved by either containing the magnetic flux lines within a restricted area, converting the stray magnetic energy into heat or reflecting the magnetic field. At low frequencies, stray magnetic fields are often just contained, while at high frequencies, all three methods are utilized. Since this paper deals with low frequency stray fields, only the containment method is discussed. The object of containment is to surround a stray magnetic radiation source with a material that exhibits a very high relative permeability with respect to that of air. This provides a low resistance continuous path for the stray flux lines to follow. Magnetic resistance is known as Reluctance, Â. The highest permeability materials contain 80% nickel and exhibit relative permeabilities in
excess of 300,000; however, the permeability of these materials is high at low flux densities and quickly reduces to a low value at moderate flux densities. Lower permeability materials such as soft iron and steel retain their permeabilies at relatively high flux densities but require thicker sections than high permeability materials to achieve the same shield effectiveness at low flux densities.
Double shielded enclosures are sometimes utilized to take advantage of these properties. For instance, the shield material closest to the high field level is often of a low permeability steel, while the material farthest from the high field level is of a high permeability, 80% nickel material.
Shield effectiveness or attenuation,
The shield effectiveness or attenuation, a =mt/Dwhere m is the relative permeability of the material at the flux density, t is the thickness of the shield and D is the diameter of the sphere. Both t and D should be expressed in the same units. In a long shielding cylinder, with the field direction normal to the axis of the cylinder, half of the above attenuation can be theoretically achieved.The flux density in the material can be determined by utilizing the following formula b =.4pDH0/twhere b is the flux density in Gauss and H0 is the external field intensity in Oersteds. b vs H curves or m vs b or H curves can be utilized to determine the permeability of a particular material in the magnetic field.Thus, surrounding stray magnetic radiation with a high permeability material in a continuous void free package should provide significant attenuation. However, very few applications would allow void free packaging because it is usually necessary to fabricate the enclosure with seams and to provide access for repair and maintenance. Additionally, holes must be provided for input and output wires and terminations. Thus, it is necessary to utilize discontinuous material packaging techniques with the achievable attenuation characteristics significantly below that of the previously calculated levels. Reasonably good shields can still be designed by utilizing techniques to reduce the reluctance between all interfacing members of an enclosure. These techniques make good shield design an engineering art tempered by experience. Sam Goldfarb, President of Mechanical Consulting Co., specializes in the packaging of optics and electronics, and the analysis of shock, vibration and thermal designs. Sam holds BME and MME degrees from the City College of New York and is a registered Professional Engineer. Sam can be reached at (516) 432-1174.
EDA has continuously published the EDA digest, a quarterly minitechnical journal since July, 1983. EDA maintains Copyrights to all articles from the EDA digest. No part of the EDA digest can be reproduced without written approval.
Electronic Development Associates, Inc.
All rights reserved. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||